[Arktwo] Upcoming meetings

[Bruce Beach]

Lots of curious meetings 
at this moment.

June 1-4 
Bilderberg Meeting in Turkey

June 6th 
Extraordinary cabinet meeting 
in Israel 
regarding Syria

June 6 ECB Governing Council 
to announce decision on 
European interest rates

June 6-8 G-8 meeting Germany
Chinese President Hu may not attend
Bush to meet privately with Putin

June 10 (1967) 40th anniversary
Israel capture of Golan Heights from Syria

June 12-15 in Vienna 
emergency conference on the CFE Treaty 
called by Putin

June 19th 
Bush meets Olmert in Washington

June 29th 
Native demonstrations in Canada

July 1-2 Bush has invited Putin 
to a private meeting is Kennebunkport, Maine.

There are undoubtedly many more meetings 
that I have overlooked - 
and it is impossible to say 
which ones will most effect 
future events.

There are meetings underway 
in Europe 
with the Iranians - 
and meetings within the UN 
regarding the Iranian nukes. 

There are meetings taking place 
in the UN, 
in Washington, 
in the Kremlin, 
in Beijing, 
and who knows where else as - 
neocons, 
communists, 
capitalists, 
Islamists and others - 
spin their plots 
for influence, power and control. 

The forces involved 
are more interweaved 
than the pieces on a chessboard. 
The movement of one 
may have unexpected effects upon another - 
and while each player may determine 
their own moves - 
they can't necessarily determine 
how the other sides will respond.

We all know that Iran 
is a primary piece in the chess game - 
but this week Russia has made some bold moves, 
and major threats. 

I am also particularly watching 
the Syria scene. 
The US is putting great pressure on Syria 
through the UN 
and Israel is afraid that 
Syria may use a move on them as a gambit. 
Hence the big meeting in Israel tomorrow, 
and watching of the above mentioned 
historical date. 

Pakistan, India, Taiwan, North Korea, China
are all pieces in motion. 
Activities are astir in South America. 
Each of these would be getting 
major attention from the US 
except for its preoccupation elsewhere. 

No one is controlling 
the overall scene - 
but many players are causing 
their spheres of influence to tremble.

The gathering of the 
Bilderberger Group 
in Turkey 
this week - 
has been a matter of note - 
and I have spent considerable time 
analyzing it. 

One thing that I have done - 
that I am not aware of anyone else doing -
is to compare the published list of invitees 
with the Forbes List of Billionaires.

There are 947 Billionaires on the Forbes List.

The 'Father of Institutional Economics', 
Thorstein Veblen, created the 
'Theory of Conspicuous Consumption', 
as a basic motive to gain and display wealth. 

Among the visible wealthy,  
while most still remain  
embued with simple greed and hording, 
there is, I am happy to say, 
a growing display of 
conspicuous philanthropy.

I found it curious, however, 
that while some of the Forbes List 
are inclined towards philantrophy 
only three were involved 
in the power and influence 
of the Bilderberger's Group.

The 3 names from the Forbes List 
that were on the Bilderberger list, were:

194  Hubert Burda Germany  67  4.3  
349  Henry Kravis United States  63  2.6  
and
349  David Rockefeller Sr. United States  91  2.6  

Kravis and Rockefeller 
are both ranked at 349 
on the Forbes List. 
This means that there are more than  
350 billionaires on the Forbes List 
with more money than they have.
They each only have 2.6 billion. 
A billion being a thousand million -
that is still two thousand six hundred MILLIONS 
each.

I am not really certain whether 
it is David Sr. or David Jr. 
that attends Bilderbergers these days. 
Both have been active in it. 
Senior attended the very first meeting 
but I think it is Junior that goes now.
Nelson Rockefeller used to play a primary role 
in the Bilderbergers in his day. 
He was another son of David Sr., 
and at one time V.P. of the U.S. -
but he is gone now. 

The saying is that David Sr. 
never expressed an interest in the US Presidency - 
because it would have been a step down for him.
Nelson himself said - 
"I never wanted to be the V.P. of anything".

I had somewhat of an interesting connection 
to Nelson - 
at the Republican Convention 
that was won by Barry Goldwater - 
now hangs on my wall -
but that is another long story.

One of my assignments was to open 
bushel baskets of telegrams 
that were sent to Nelson - 
and another was to guard a painting -
which still hangs on my living room wall.

Nelson had a bit of a falling out 
with the Bilderbergers 
because they wouldn't admit the Asians 
and it is for that reason that he started 
the Trilateral Commission. 
These three - 
the Bilderbergers, 
the Trilateral Commission, 
and the strongly Rockefeller supported 
Council on Foreign Relations - 
(along with the 'Think Tanks' which the spawn)
determine the government policies in the capitalist world.
The influence is exerted 
through the nominal roles of government - 
whose members flit back and forth 
between government offices 
and the named organizations. 

It makes no difference -
which political party is in power. 
The Rockefellers are a main force 
in all three organizations 
and are a major influence 
in the Republican Party -
but when Jimmy Carter took office as president, 
he named 23 people from the Trilateral Commission - 
to take leading government roles - 
and in order to do so 
they had to temporarily resign their positions 
with the Trilateral Commission. 

A major area of economic study 
that I have always pursued 
has been that of concentration of wealth. 
It was the subject of my graduate thesis -
and I have always retained the interest. 
Therefore - 
I found it interesting 
that so few billionaires are members 
of the Bilderbergers. 
Oh, many, 
such as the wife of Bill Gates,
have attended their meetings - 
in the past - 
but really - 
there is little involvement there. 

More curious yet - 
I do not find the names 
that I would expect to find 
on the Forbes List of Billionaires. 
For example - 
there is no Rothschild. 
This makes me suspicious that 
what we have here is a list 
of the 'nouveau riche' 
and that the real wealth and power 
remains hidden. 
Indeed, one of the goals of real wealth, 
and power is to become invisible 
and hidden behind the scenes 
so that it will not be touched by revolutions. 

The Rothschild name has appeared 
on previous Bilderberger attendance rosters - 
and representatives of Rothschild interests 
are included in the present one. 
But - 
the Rothschilds and other names 
of great influence - 
as were found in Ferdinand's 200 list 
almost a century ago - 
are not now listed as attendees. 

So - 
if the Bilderbergers are not 
the over 900 'nouveau riche' of the present - 
nor the 'established old money' of the past - 
then who are they? 
These wheeler-dealer / shakers and movers 
are hired guns 
of the 'real' western wealth and power - 
just as are the board of directos  
and the CEOs and managers of the 
International Corporations - 
no matter how highly paid.

No conspiracy here. 
Just the 
'think alike' 
'look alike'
'work alike' 
attitudes of those who 
have been promoted up through the ranks. 

Islamists and Jews 
aren't going to end up holding seats 
around the Cardinal's Table in the Vatican. 
Capitalists aren't going to be seated 
in the Kremlin or Beijing. 
Nor communists in Washington 
regardless of what the 'Far Right' thinks.

Those who rise to power 
in the banking and corporate systems 
don't need to be told how to think. 
If they didn't think 'correctly' 
they would never have been promoted up the ranks.

What is scary - 
is what constitutes 'right thinking' 
in those ranks. 
You find a particular mindset in the Vatican - 
and a particular mindset in the Islamist schools. 
You find a particular mindset among communists -
and in the ranks of the capitalists.

Each of those that I have mentioned - 
have plans for a New World Order. 
Everything from the 
Return of Christ or the Mahdi -
to the establishment of 
a godless state.

Western capitalism 
gives a certain lip service 
to religion. 
The US dollar says - 
"In God We Trust", 
and includes the image 
of the all-seeing eye of God. 
(Yes, I am familiar with the 
Masonic - Illuminati - theories, 
and yes I know that FDR -
who approved the design - 
was a Mason).

Religion was an important part 
of the mores of America's founding fathers - 
but now - 
the values that will get one promoted 
through the establishment ranks 
in the banks, corporations, 
and institutions of influence 
such as the think tanks of the 
Bilderbergers, 
the Trilateral Commission, 
and the CFR - 
are those of greed and the lust for power. 
Today, 
you could throw a stone into those crowds 
without fear of hitting one 
who had attended church on Sunday.

This is not to say - 
that they are without social morals. 
They simply 'truly believe' 
that what is good for them - 
is good for the world. 

They see themselves as 
the real producers of the wealth of mankind - 
and most others as 'useless eaters'. 
They truly believe 
that the advance of civilization 
depends upon their success. 

Their 'globalist' view and goal - 
is to implement a New World Order, 
that will have at its basis 
a World Government, 
a World Police Force, 
and a World Monetary System - 
that will operate to their benefit - 
and hence to the benefit of the world.

That is all very well and good - 
and I, as well as others wanting a NWO, 
will only disagree as to what we see 
as being to the benefit of the world - 
because values based only upon 
greed and power - 
seem inadequate to us. 

I am also in agreement with 
the Christians, 
Muslims, 
and Jews, 
that there needs to be 
One World Religion -
that will correct the above deficiency in morals. 
Here there is only some misunderstanding 
about how that is going to come about. 

The communists will of course say - 
that both of those approaches are wrong. 
That what is needed is 
a humanistic system of social morality 
without God.

My great concern - 
is that these opposing views 
are about to  battle each other 
and I wonder how much of their power 
and philosophies 
will remain after the great catastrophe - 
to wrongly direct the reconstruction 
of the New Social Order.

Peace and love,
Bruce
DawnSayer@webpal.org